How can I be sure that the blood offered is really from unvaccinated people?

Update May 2024:

Ever since SafeBlood and Safereproduction were launched, we have been looking for an analysis that would allow us to determine whether blood for transfusion or a sperm donation comes from a vaccinated or unvaccinated donor. Until now, the selection of our donors has been based solely on the trust that our members will correctly declare their vaccination status. But now we finally have a blood analysis that allows us to determine the following:

1. Residues of any Covid19 vaccines
2. The presence of spike proteins
3. Whether the functionality of your RNA and DNA is disrupted or damaged

For me, the latter is the biggest sensation, because it shows whether there is a need for therapy and whether the mRNA injection has actually resulted in a significant impairment of your genetic material. We know that different batch numbers, e.g. in the Pfizer vaccinations, triggered very different side effects; from “placebo” with zero effect, to immediate death in the most dangerous batches.

Everything about the Covid19 Vaccine Residual Analysis can be found here.

Status before May 2024 and general information:

At the moment, microscopic examination of the blood by an experienced professional is the only method of determining blood showing effects of mRNA vaccination from normal blood. As we partner with laboratories and clinics we are seeking to make examination of donor blood available. Until then members may be able to arrange examination with local professionals in their area who offer Dark Field Microscopy (DFM) examination. 

Trust between the donor and recipient is necessary. Members requiring directed donation may be most comfortable first seeking donors from among family, friends, and other trust networks, for whom Safe Blood will facilitate the donation through medical providers.

We have high confidence in the integrity of our member donors. That said, in theory a “troll” or terrorist might seek to falsely pass him or herself off as unvaccinated. We believe that is a low-probability risk, especially compared the high probability of receiving mRNA-vaccinated blood through existing blood banks. 

In regard to the goal of creating an mRNA-vaccine-free blood bank, modern scientific methods have yet to develop a rapid test capable of differentiating between vaccinated and unvaccinated blood with one hundred percent accuracy necessary for that project. Until the science advances to achieve this technology such a blood bank is illusory. Fortunately, we have many scientists on our side (people like Prof. Bhakdi, Hockertz and many more) and they are working hard to get this done.

As an observational tool, DFM is one of several microscopy methods capable of detecting the effects of the spike protein in the blood subsequent to mRNA vaccination. Dark field microscopy is the tool of choice, with which the differences in the blood can be clearly visualized. This use is different that that of DFM as a tool for diagnosing specific diseases, which is not yet universally recognized by mainstream western medicine.

In other words, to operate a blood bank, will require widespread agreement regarding microscopy methods and standards that are currently in development. We will be able to provide this, but we still need time.